Dissemination of IT for the Promotion of Materials Science (DoITPoMS)

PreviousNext

This should not be confused with the methanol used to power the DMFC or the other fuels such as methane which can fuel high temperature cells, here we are talking about fuelling a normal hydrogen cell by producing hydrogen on demand from some hydrogen rich man made fuel which is easier to store than pure hydrogen in one of the forms listed above.

The fuel we choose for such a system should:

  • Give up hydrogen easily
  • Be cheap to produce (not requiring significantly more energy than is released when the fuel is used)
  • Be safe to store and handle

This table outlines some possible fuels, along with their advantages and disadvantages:

Fuel

Details

Pros

Cons

Methanol

CH3OH

Lots of interest into methanol, hydrogen is extracted using the steam reforming process:

CH3OH + H2O → CO2 + 3H2

Reformers have undergone significant advances in recent years. See section on automobiles.

  • Relatively safe
  • Storage isn’t too difficult but must ensure that it can’t leak into water.
  • Highly flammable (although less than petrol)
  • Toxic (highly soluble in water and tasteless hence quite dangerous) but NOT an accumulative toxin – small amounts can be broken down by the body

Alkali metal hydrides

such as NaH or CaH2

MH + H2O → MOH + H2

is a very simple way to produce hydrogen. “Powerballs” have been marketed, 3 cm spheres of NaH coated with polythene and stored underwater. They’re cut in half as required producing hydrogen.

Some applications in some situations perhaps, but not very practical.

 

  • Decent energy density and specific energy
  • Simple.
  • Need to dispose of lots of hydroxide solution, and also carry it around in a mobile application.
  • Requires more energy to manufacture the hydride than is released by the fuel.

Ammonia – NH3

Hydrogen is recovered by a catalysed dissociation reaction:

NH3 → ½ N2 + 3/2 H2

which takes place at between 600 and 800 °C. It’s an endothermic reaction,
ΔH = +46.4 kJ mol-1

 

  • Liquefies at -33 °C
  • Very high energy density
  • Toxic from 100 ppm (and smelly)
  • Requires a lot of energy (and hydrogen) to produce ammonia via the Harber process.
  • Product gas is difficult to use in cells other than AFCs due to remnants of ammonium hydroxide

 

Sodium borohydride solution

NaBH4 – 30% solution is typical. (dry NaBH4 ignites spontaneously in air)

The reaction is as follows:

NaBH4 + 2H2O → NaBO2 + 4H2

It’s an exothermic reaction. The NaBH4 solution contains everything necessary for the reaction; it’s brought into contact with a catalyst to initiate the dissociation.

This is a very promising fuel and is used in several military applications. Currently the price is prohibitive.

  • Hydrogen gas is the only product gas produced, no CO2 diluting it.
  • The Hydrogen is produced with water vapour which is very useful for PEMFCs
  • NaBH4 is very expensive to produce
  • The tank can’t really be refilled; the NaBO2 solution must be emptied and replaced with fresh borohydride.

 

Fuels compared

The following table lists the effectiveness of all hydrogen producing fuels in terms of specific energy and energy density:

Liquids

Formula

Percent Hydrogen

Density
(kg L-1)

Vol to store 1 kg of H2
(L)

Other details

LH2

H2

100

0.07

14

Stored at 22 K

Ammonia

NH3

17.76

0.67

8.5

Toxic at 100 ppm

Liquid Methane

CH4

25.1

0.415

9.6

Liquid at 98K

Methanol

CH3OH

12.5

0.79

10

 

Ethanol

CH3CH2OH

13.0

0.79

9.7

 

Hydrazine

N2H2

12.58

1.011

7.8

Very toxic

30% Sodium-borohydride solution

NaBH4 + H2O

6.3

1.06

15

Expensive but very effective